THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
Ken Paxton

Friday, August 17, 2012

North Texas Law Enforcement Operation Targets Video Sweepstakes Scheme

State investigators today arrested senior executives with Haltom City-based HEST Technologies Inc. during a joint operation led by the Texas Attorney General’s Office, the Anderson County Criminal District Attorney’s Office and the Tarrant County Criminal District Attorney’s Office. Federal and local law enforcement agencies also executed search warrants at HEST’s headquarters and at the residences of five executives and the operator of an alleged charitable organization. The defendants face felony gambling, money laundering and organized criminal activity charges. The Texas Attorney General’s Office will prosecute the cases in conjunction with the Tarrant and the Anderson County Criminal District Attorney’s Offices. Assistant Attorney General David Glickler will serve as the lead prosecutor for the State.

In addition to the Texas Attorney General’s Office and the Tarrant and Anderson County Criminal District Attorney’s Offices, the following agencies have participated in the HEST investigation:
Tarrant County Sheriff’s Office
Dallas Police Department
U.S. Secret Service
FBI’s Dallas and Tyler offices
Internal Revenue Service’s office in Dallas

Assistance was also provided by the California Department of Justice, the Massachusetts Attorney General’s Office, the Massachusetts State Police and the Virginia Commonwealth Attorney’s Office in Virginia Beach.

HEST’s promotional materials claim the corporation develops sweepstakes promotional systems. According to the felony charges filed against the defendants, however, HEST’s so-called sweepstakes systems constitute illegal gambling devices. As a result, the defendants face organized criminal activity charges for conspiring to violate state laws that prohibit gambling.

Assistant Attorney General Glickler, who is coordinating the multi-jurisdictional investigation, has successfully prosecuted video sweepstakes operations for gambling violations in the past. According to AAG Glickler, video sweepstakes promoters often attempt to circumvent anti-gambling laws by claiming to sell a lawful service such as time at an Internet caf that is used to induce gamblers to participate in an illegal electronic sweepstakes. Earlier this month, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit rejected two video sweepstakes promoters’ legal argument, finding: the main purpose of [the defendants’] Internet cafs was to induce people to play the sweepstakes, and that the Internet time sold by the cafswas not the primary subject of the transaction, but instead mere subterfuge.