Cornyn Open Records Letter uling <P>September 1, 1999
Click for home page Office of the Attorney General - State of Texas
John Cornyn
image
 

September 1, 1999

Ms. Tenley Aldredge
Assistant County Attorney
County of Travis
P.O. Box 1748
Austin, Texas 78767

OR-2467

Dear Ms. Aldredge:

You ask whether certain information is subject to required public disclosure under chapter 552 of the Government Code. Your request was assigned ID# 126966.

Travis County (the "county") received a request for all information related to three criminal cases in which Ivory Dean Clement, Sr. is a party. You indicate that documents on file with the District Clerk's Office will be made available to the requestor. You seek to withhold other responsive information asserting that it is excepted from public disclosure by sections 552.101, 552.108, and 552.111 of the Government Code. We have considered the exceptions you claim and have reviewed the documents at issue.

Section 552.108(a)(3) excepts from required public disclosure

(a) Information held by a law enforcement agency or prosecutor that deals with the detection, investigation, or prosecution of crime . . . if:

. . . .

(3) it is information that:

(A) is prepared by an attorney representing the state in anticipation of or in the course of preparing for criminal litigation; or

(B) reflects the mental impressions or legal reasoning of an attorney representing the state[.]

You contend that the records responsive to the instant request may be withheld in their entirety under the ruling in Curry v. Walker, 873 S.W.2d 379 (Tex. 1994). There, the Texas Supreme Court ruled that, where a district attorney's entire litigation file was sought by subpoena, the work product privilege extended to the entire file because, as requested, that material reflected the attorney's mental impressions. Here, the requestor seeks entire prosecution files. We agree that you may withhold the prosecution files responsive to the instant request in their entirety under section 552.108(a)(3)(B) in conjunction with the ruling in Curry. Since we have disposed of this request under section 552.108(a)(3)(B), we need not address at this time the other exceptions to disclosure you raised.

We are resolving this matter with an informal letter ruling rather than with a published open records decision. This ruling is limited to the particular records at issue under the facts presented to us in this request and should not be relied upon as a previous determination regarding any other records. If you have questions about this ruling, please contact our office.

Sincerely,

Michael Jay Burns

Assistant Attorney General

Open Records Division

MJB/ch

Ref: ID# 126966

Enclosures: Marked documents

cc: Ms Jill Gant
Onstad Law Firm
903 Ranch Road 620 South, Suite 302
Austin, TX 78734-5609
(w/o enclosures)


 

POST OFFICE BOX 12548, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2548 TEL: (512) 463-2100 WEB: WWW.OAG.STATE.TX.US
An Equal Employment Opportunity Employer


Home | ORLs