Click for home page Office of the Attorney General - State of Texas
John Cornyn
image
 

October 26, 1999

Mr. John Steiner
Division Chief
Law Department
City of Austin
P.O. Box 1546
Austin, Texas 78767-1546

OR99-3020

Dear Mr. Steiner:

You ask whether certain information is subject to required public disclosure under chapter 552 of the Government Code. Your request was assigned ID# 128695.

The City of Austin received a request for a waste permit file of a specified company. You advised that some of the requested information may implicate the property rights of Pentagon Technologies Group, Inc. (the "company") and this office accordingly notified the company about the request for information. See Gov't Code 552.305 (permitting interested third party to submit to attorney general reasons why requested information should not be released). The company responded and argued that portions of the requested information are trade secrets protected by section 552.110 of the Government Code.

Section 552.110 excepts from required public disclosure

[a] trade secret or commercial or financial information obtained from a person and privileged or confidential by statute or judicial decision.

A "trade secret"

may consist of any formula, pattern, device or compilation of information which is used in one's business, and which gives [one] an opportunity to obtain an advantage over competitors who do not know or use it. It may be a formula for a chemical compound, a process of manufacturing, treating or preserving materials, a pattern for a machine or other device, or a list of customers. It differs from other secret information in a business in that it is not simply information as to single or ephemeral events in the conduct of the business, as for example the amount or other terms of a secret bid for a contract or the salary of certain employees. . . . A trade secret is a process or device for continuous use in the operation of the business. Generally it relates to the production of goods, as for example, a machine or formula for the production of an article. It may, however, relate to the sale of goods or to other operations in the business, such as a code for determining discounts, rebates or other concessions in a price list or catalogue, or a list of specialized customers, or a method of bookkeeping or other office management.

Restatement of Torts 757 cmt. b (1939) (emphasis added). See also Hyde Corp. v. Huffines, 314 S.W.2d 763, 776 (Tex. 1958); Open Records Decision Nos. 255 (1980); 232 (1979); 217 (1978).

There are six factors to be assessed in determining whether information qualifies as a trade secret:

1) the extent to which the information is known outside of [the company's] business;

2) the extent to which it is known by employees and others involved in [the company's] business;

3) the extent of measures taken by [the company] to guard the secrecy of the information;

4) the value of the information to [the company] and to [its] competitors;

5) the amount of effort or money expended by [the company] in developing this information; and

6) the ease or difficulty with which the information could be properly acquired or duplicated by others.

Restatement of Torts 757 cmt. b (1939); see also Open Records Decision No. 232 (1979). This office must accept a claim that information is excepted as a trade secret if a prima facie case for exemption is made and no argument is submitted that rebuts the claim as a matter of law. Open Records Decision No. 552 (1990). However, where no evidence of the factors necessary to establish a trade secret claim is made we cannot conclude that section 552.110 applies. Open Records Decision No. 402 (1983).

The company argues that the information pertaining to the chemicals used at its plant, waste contents, and the schematics of the layout of its facility are trade secrets. Having reviewed these arguments and the information at issue, we conclude that the company has established a prima facie case that portions of the requested information constitute trade secrets. We have marked the parts of the submitted information which we have determined you must withhold under the trade secret prong of section 552.110. The remaining portions of the requested information must be released.(1)

We are resolving this matter with an informal letter ruling rather than with a published open records decision. This ruling is limited to the particular records at issue under the facts presented to us in this request and should not be relied upon as a previous determination regarding any other records. If you have questions about this ruling, please contact our office.

Sincerely,

William Walker
Assistant Attorney General
Open Records Division

WMW/ch

Ref: ID# 128695

Encl. Submitted documents

cc: Mr. Chris Hall
3027 E. Washington Street
Phoenix, Arizona 85034
(w/o enclosures)


 

Footnotes

1. Although you also raised section 552.101 of the Government Code, you did not explain why section 552.101 would apply to the information at issue. Therefore, we have not addressed this exception.
 

POST OFFICE BOX 12548, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2548 TEL: (512) 463-2100 WEB: WWW.OAG.STATE.TX.US
An Equal Employment Opportunity Employer


Home | ORLs