Click for home page
Office of the ATTORNEY GENERAL
GREG ABBOTT
image
 

December 17, 2002

Ms. Carol Longoria
Public Information Coordinator
The University of Texas System
201 West Seventh Street
Austin, Texas 78701-2902

OR2002-7238

Dear Ms. Longoria:

You ask whether certain information is subject to required public disclosure under chapter 552 of the Government Code. Your request was assigned ID# 173758.

The University of Texas System (the "system") received a request for information relating to participants in the Optional Retirement Program. You claim that the requested information is excepted from disclosure under sections 552.101, 552.102, and 552.117 of the Government Code. We have considered the exceptions you claim and have reviewed the information you submitted.(1)

Section 552.101 of the Government Code excepts from disclosure "information considered to be confidential by law, either constitutional, statutory, or by judicial decision." You raise section 552.101 in conjunction with the common-law right to privacy. Common-law privacy protects information that is (1) highly intimate or embarrassing, such that its release would be highly objectionable to a person of ordinary sensibilities, and (2) of no legitimate public interest. See Industrial Found. v. Texas Ind. Accident Bd., 540 S.W.2d 668, 685 (Tex. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 931 (1977). Section 552.102 excepts from disclosure "information in a personnel file, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy[.]" Gov't Code 552.102(a). The test of privacy under section 552.102(a) is the same as the common-law privacy test under section 552.101. See Hubert v. Harte-Hanks Tex. Newspapers, Inc., 652 S.W.2d 546, 549-51 (Tex. App.--Austin 1983, writ ref'd n.r.e.). Therefore, we will address your privacy claim under section 552.101. In prior decisions, this office has determined that financial information relating only to an individual ordinarily satisfies the first element of the common-law privacy test, but the public has a legitimate interest in the essential facts about a financial transaction between an individual and a governmental body. See, e.g., Open Records Decision Nos. 600 at 9-12 (1992) (TexFlex benefits), 545 at 3-5 (1990) (deferred compensation plan), 523 at 3-4 (1989) (certain financial information contained in loan files of veterans participating in Veterans Land Board programs), 373 at 3-4 (1983) (certain financial information contained in housing rehabilitation grant application files).

You inform us that the Optional Retirement Program (the "ORP") is an alternative retirement plan that is available to certain employees of the system. You explain that the submitted information is a partial listing of employees who have elected to participate in the ORP. You assert that because this information reveals these employees' choice of the ORP as their retirement plan, the information is private under section 552.101. We disagree. According to the ORP policy and procedures memorandum that you provided to this office, both the employee and the employer contribute to the ORP based on rates established by the legislature. See also Gov't Code 830.201(a) (providing for state contribution each fiscal year to optional retirement program). Thus, inasmuch as the ORP is financed in part with public funds, there is a legitimate public interest in the essential facts about an employee's participation in the program. Therefore, we conclude that the submitted names, home addresses, and social security numbers of participants in the ORP are not excepted from disclosure under section 552.101 in conjunction with common-law privacy. See Open Records Decision No. 600 at 9-10 (1992) (addressing legitimate public interest in essential features of participation in group insurance program funded in part by state).

We note that some of these home addresses and social security numbers may be excepted from disclosure under section 552.117 of the Government Code. Section 552.117(1) excepts from disclosure the home addresses and telephone numbers, social security numbers, and family member information of current or former officials or employees of a governmental body who request that this information be kept confidential under section 552.024. Whether a particular piece of information is protected by section 552.117 must be determined at the time the request for it is made. See Open Records Decision No. 530 at 5 (1989). Therefore, the system may only withhold information under section 552.117 on behalf of a current or former official or employee who made a request for confidentiality under section 552.024 prior to the date on which the request for this information was made. For those officials and employees who timely elected to keep their personal information confidential, the system must withhold the employees' home addresses and social security numbers. The system may not withhold this information under section 552.117 for a current or former official or employee who did not make a timely election to keep the information confidential.

A social security number also may be confidential under section 552.101 in conjunction with 1990 amendments to the federal Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(c)(2)(C)(viii)(I), if a governmental body obtained or maintains the social security number pursuant to any provision of law enacted on or after October 1, 1990. See Open Records Decision No. 622 at 2-4 (1994). It is not apparent to this office that any social security number contained in the submitted information is confidential under section 405(c)(2)(C)(viii)(I) of the federal law. You have cited no law, and we are aware of no law, enacted on or after October 1, 1990 that authorizes the system to obtain or maintain a social security number. Thus, we have no basis for concluding that any social security number contained in the submitted information was obtained or is maintained pursuant to such a law and is therefore confidential under the federal law. We caution you, however, that chapter 552 of the Government Code imposes criminal penalties for the release of confidential information. See Gov't Code 552.007, .352. Therefore, before releasing a social security number, the system should ensure that it was not obtained and is not maintained pursuant to any provision of law enacted on or after October 1, 1990.

In summary, the system must withhold the home address and social security number of a current or former official or employee of the system who timely requested confidentiality for this information under section 552.024. A social security number also may be excepted from disclosure under section 552.101 in conjunction with section 405(c)(2)(C)(viii)(I) of title 42 of the United States Code. With these possible exceptions, the requested information must be released.

This letter ruling is limited to the particular records at issue in this request and limited to the facts as presented to us; therefore, this ruling must not be relied upon as a previous determination regarding any other records or any other circumstances.

This ruling triggers important deadlines regarding the rights and responsibilities of the governmental body and of the requestor. For example, governmental bodies are prohibited from asking the attorney general to reconsider this ruling. Gov't Code 552.301(f). If the governmental body wants to challenge this ruling, the governmental body must appeal by filing suit in Travis County within 30 calendar days. Id. 552.324(b). In order to get the full benefit of such an appeal, the governmental body must file suit within 10 calendar days. Id. 552.353(b)(3), (c). If the governmental body does not appeal this ruling and the governmental body does not comply with it, then both the requestor and the attorney general have the right to file suit against the governmental body to enforce this ruling. Id. 552.321(a).

If this ruling requires the governmental body to release all or part of the requested information, the governmental body is responsible for taking the next step. Based on the statute, the attorney general expects that, within 10 calendar days of this ruling, the governmental body will do one of the following three things: 1) release the public records; 2) notify the requestor of the exact day, time, and place that copies of the records will be provided or that the records can be inspected; or 3) notify the requestor of the governmental body's intent to challenge this letter ruling in court. If the governmental body fails to do one of these three things within 10 calendar days of this ruling, then the requestor should report that failure to the attorney general's Open Government Hotline, toll free, at 877/673-6839. The requestor may also file a complaint with the district or county attorney. Id. 552.3215(e).

If this ruling requires or permits the governmental body to withhold all or some of the requested information, the requestor can appeal that decision by suing the governmental body. Id. 552.321(a); Texas Department of Public Safety v. Gilbreath, 842 S.W.2d 408,411 (Tex. App.--Austin 1992, no writ).

Please remember that under the Act the release of information triggers certain procedures for costs and charges to the requestor. If records are released in compliance with this ruling, be sure that all charges for the information are at or below the legal amounts. Questions or complaints about over-charging must be directed to Hadassah Schloss at the Texas Building and Procurement Commission at 512/475-2497.

If the governmental body, the requestor, or any other person has questions or comments about this ruling, they may contact our office. We note that a third party may challenge this ruling by filing suit seeking to withhold information from a requestor. Gov't Code 552.325. Although there is no statutory deadline for contacting us, the attorney general prefers to receive any comments within 10 calendar days of the date of this ruling.

Sincerely,

James W. Morris, III
Assistant Attorney General
Open Records Division
JWM/sdk
Ref: ID# 173758
Enc: Submitted documents

c: Mr. Troy A. Dryer
ING Financial Advisers
8911 Capital of Texas Hwy, Suite 1300
Austin, Texas 78759
(w/o enclosures)


 

Footnotes

1. This letter ruling assumes that the submitted representative sample of information is truly representative of the requested information as a whole. This ruling neither reaches nor authorizes the system to withhold any information that is substantially different from the submitted information. See Gov't Code 552.301(e)(1)(D): Open Records Decision Nos. 499 at 6 (1988), 497 at 4 (1988).
 

POST OFFICE BOX 12548, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2548 TEL: (512) 463-2100 WEB: WWW.OAG.STATE.TX.US
An Equal Employment Opportunity Employer


Home | ORLs