Click for home page
Office of the ATTORNEY GENERAL
GREG ABBOTT
image
 

December 17, 2002

Ms. Sylvia F. Hardman
Deputy Commissioner for Legal Services
Texas Rehabilitation Commission
4900 North Lamar Boulevard
Austin, Texas 78751-2399

OR2002-7241

Dear Ms. Hardman:

You ask whether certain information is subject to required public disclosure under chapter 552 of the Government Code. Your request was assigned ID#173776.

The Texas Rehabilitation Commission (the "commission") received three requests for information pertaining to the questions, expected answers, answers of the individuals selected, applications of the selected individuals, matrix, and the requestor's answers for position numbers 1502, 0189, and 0484 (Program Specialist III). You claim that some of the requested information is excepted from disclosure under section 552.122 of the Government Code. We have considered the exception you claim and reviewed the submitted information.

Initially, we note that you only seek a decision from this office regarding the submitted interview questions, answers, and expected answers. Therefore, we assume that you have released any remaining responsive information to the requestor. If you have not released any such information, you must release it to the requestor at this time. See Gov't Code 552.301(a), .302.

Section 552.122(b) excepts from disclosure test items developed by a licensing agency or governmental body. In Open Records Decision No. 626 (1994), this office determined that the term "test item" in section 552.122 includes any standard means by which an individual's or group's knowledge or ability in a particular area is evaluated, but does not encompass evaluations of an employee's overall job performance or suitability. Whether information falls within the section 552.122 exception must be determined on a case-by-case basis. Open Records Decision No. 626 at 6 (1994). Traditionally, this office has applied section 552.122 where release of "test items" might compromise the effectiveness of future examinations. Id. at 4-5; see also Open Records Decision No. 118 (1976). Additionally, when answers to test questions might reveal the questions themselves, the answers may be withheld under section 552.122(b). See Open Records Decision No. 626 at 8 (1994).

You contend that all of the interview questions from each job posting (dated June 23, 2202, July 25, 2002, and August 20, 2002) are excepted from disclosure under section 552.122(b) of the Government Code. After reviewing the submitted information, we have determined that interview questions numbered two, three, and the portion of question number seven that we have marked from the set dated June 23, 2002, and interview questions numbered two, four, eight, and nine from the set dated August 20, 2002, along with their preferred and actual answers, do not satisfy the section 552.122 criteria and must be released. However, we agree that the remaining interview questions for each job posting constitute "test items" as contemplated by section 552.122(b) and accordingly may be withheld along with the preferred and actual answers for each.

You have asked that we issue to the commission a previous determination allowing it to withhold interview questions and answers without requesting a ruling. As noted above, whether information falls within the section 552.122 exception must be determined on a case-by-case basis. Open Records Decision No. 626 at 6 (1994). For this reason, we decline to issue a previous determination that would grant the commission the authority to withhold all interview questions and answers categorically.

This letter ruling is limited to the particular records at issue in this request and limited to the facts as presented to us; therefore, this ruling must not be relied upon as a previous determination regarding any other records or any other circumstances.

This ruling triggers important deadlines regarding the rights and responsibilities of the governmental body and of the requestor. For example, governmental bodies are prohibited from asking the attorney general to reconsider this ruling. Gov't Code 552.301(f). If the governmental body wants to challenge this ruling, the governmental body must appeal by filing suit in Travis County within 30 calendar days. Id. 552.324(b). In order to get the full benefit of such an appeal, the governmental body must file suit within 10 calendar days. Id. 552.353(b)(3), (c). If the governmental body does not appeal this ruling and the governmental body does not comply with it, then both the requestor and the attorney general have the right to file suit against the governmental body to enforce this ruling. Id. 552.321(a).

If this ruling requires the governmental body to release all or part of the requested information, the governmental body is responsible for taking the next step. Based on the statute, the attorney general expects that, within 10 calendar days of this ruling, the governmental body will do one of the following three things: 1) release the public records; 2) notify the requestor of the exact day, time, and place that copies of the records will be provided or that the records can be inspected; or 3) notify the requestor of the governmental body's intent to challenge this letter ruling in court. If the governmental body fails to do one of these three things within 10 calendar days of this ruling, then the requestor should report that failure to the attorney general's Open Government Hotline, toll free, at 877/673-6839. The requestor may also file a complaint with the district or county attorney. Id. 552.3215(e).

If this ruling requires or permits the governmental body to withhold all or some of the requested information, the requestor can appeal that decision by suing the governmental body. Id. 552.321(a); Texas Department of Public Safety v. Gilbreath, 842 S.W.2d 408,411 (Tex. App.--Austin 1992, no writ).

Please remember that under the Act the release of information triggers certain procedures for costs and charges to the requestor. If records are released in compliance with this ruling, be sure that all charges for the information are at or below the legal amounts. Questions or complaints about over-charging must be directed to Hadassah Schloss at the Texas Building and Procurement Commission at 512/475-2497.

If the governmental body, the requestor, or any other person has questions or comments about this ruling, they may contact our office. We note that a third party may challenge this ruling by filing suit seeking to withhold information from a requestor. Gov't Code 552.325. Although there is no statutory deadline for contacting us, the attorney general prefers to receive any comments within 10 calendar days of the date of this ruling.

Sincerely,

Heather Pendleton Ross
Assistant Attorney General
Open Records Division
HPR/sdk
Ref: ID# 173776
Enc: Submitted documents

c: Ms. Helen Taylor
16825 Tortoise Street
Round Rock, Texas 78664
(w/o enclosures)


 

POST OFFICE BOX 12548, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2548 TEL: (512) 463-2100 WEB: WWW.OAG.STATE.TX.US
An Equal Employment Opportunity Employer


Home | ORLs